Boom Time for American Billionaires: How the System Sustains Income Disparity
Among countless individuals in the United States, the financial landscape over the recent five-year span has been tough. Costs have soared while salaries remains flat. High mortgage rates have made homeownership a bleak prospect. The rate of unemployment has been gradually increasing.
Many Americans have stated they're delaying major life decisions, including raising children or changing careers, because of economic uncertainty. But for a very small group of people, the recent half-decade couldn't have been more prosperous.
Fortune Expansion
The wealth of the world's billionaires grew 54% in 2020, at the climax of the pandemic. And even during all the market volatility, the stock market has only continued to grow. This increase has largely benefited just a small number of Americans: 10% of the population holds 93% of stock market wealth.
As uneven as this allocation seems, it's the system working as it is existing today.
"Affluent individuals have acquired their jets, they've bought their multiple houses and mansions, but now they're buying senators and media outlets," explained inequality researcher Chuck Collins. "We're now entering this other chapter of maximum resource removal where the wealthy are taking advantage of the system of inequality."
Mapping Economic Classes
To help others comprehend what exactly it means to be "wealthy" in the US, Collins adopts a concept from journalist Robert Frank who, in a 2007 book on the rich, imagined the different levels of wealth as "Richistan" villages: Affluent Town, Lower Richistan, Middle Richistan, Upper Richistan and Billionaireville.
To contemporize the concept, Collins organizes these "affluence districts" based on income levels:
- At the lowest tier, Affluent Town, are the 10 million Americans who have a household income of at least $110,000 and an total assets of over $1.5m.
- The villages get more exclusive as wealth goes up: Lower Richistan has 2.6 million households who have wealth between $6m and $13m.
- Middle Richistan has 1.3 million households who have assets worth an average of $37m.
- Upper Richistan, made up of 130,000 Americans (roughly the size of a small city) has between $60m to $1bn in wealth.
Collectively, the residents of these villages constitute the top 10% of the wealth income distribution, about 14 million Americans altogether, though their experiences vary dramatically.
"You could be in Lower Richistan, and you're still traveling in the coach section of a commercial plane," Collins said. "Whereas in Upper Richistan, you're using a private jet. That's a really different cultural experience. You fly private, you have no stakes in the commercial aviation system. You don't care if the whole system collapses – you're set."
Extreme Affluence Consequences
The summit in "Richistan" is Billionaireville, which is made up of about 800 American billionaires who are some of the world's richest. The power that this group has far surpasses those who are simply wealthy, let alone the ordinary person who doesn't reside in "Richistan" at all.
But Collins thinks the political catchphrase "end extreme wealth" fails to address the core issue and has a "suggestion of eradication" to it.
"It's the difference between individual behaviors and a structure of regulations," Collins commented. "We should be worried about an economic system that directs so much wealth upward to the billionaires."
The Four Pillars of Billionaire Wealth
To understand how wealth at the billionaire level works, Collins separates it into four parts: acquiring fortune, protecting assets, political capture and maximum resource extraction.
When many Americans think about wealth, they usually think solely about the first step, Collins said. People can create a modest amount of wealth through starting or running a successful business, which could get them admission in Affluent Town.
But getting to Billionaireville requires significant resources and strategy in those next three steps. Collins describes what he calls the "wealth defense industry": the tax lawyers, accountants and wealth managers who use their knowledge to ensure that the super rich are being deliberate about their taxes.
"Wealth defense professionals use a extensive selection of tools such as financial instruments, foreign deposits, undisclosed businesses, non-profit organizations and other vehicles to hold assets," he writes.
Political Influence and Hyper-Extraction
To enhance a wealth defense strategy, a family needs policy assistance. Wealth of over $40m converts to political power, Collins says, and can be used to defend wealth and ensure continued growth.
The ultimate step is a different kind of wealth accumulation, one that Collins calls "extreme removal" to describe how the wealthy have come to influence nearly every single part of an Americans' daily existence largely through investment firms, which allows wealthy individuals to invest in private companies.
"Private equity is seeking those corners of the economy where they can squeeze things a little bit harder," Collins said. "One thing I don't think people comprehend is these billionaire private-equity funds are what happens when so much wealth is stored in so few hands, and they can essentially pivot and say, 'Where else can we generate returns out of the economy?' Healthcare? Great. Mobile home parks? These people can't go anywhere, [so] you can boost their expenses."
Tangible Effects
The consequences of this inequality go beyond the wealth getting wealthier. It's about people paying more for their healthcare, rent and vet bills without seeing any significant salary growth. And Collins said the pain and frustration of this kind of society can lead to profound dissatisfaction.
"The most powerful affluent rulers understand people are being marginalized [and] are financially struggling," Collins said, adding that conservative politicians have been good at connecting with a potent "phony populism".
Policy Situation
The paradox, Collins points out in his book, is that government officials have appointed a string of billionaires to government roles. Along with tech billionaires who had short yet influential roles overseeing substantial reductions to the federal workforce, other crucial appointments for commerce, treasury, education and the interior are also all billionaires.
This administrative framework, along with help from congressional allies, helped pass significant fiscal policies, which will make permanent tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations.
The Path Forward
While political parties continue to argue that border policies and bad trade agreements are the source of everyone's economic problems, "the question becomes: Will the opposing party, which has also been influenced by the billionaires and big money, be able to seriously confront the underlying harms?" Collins said.
Liberal leaders, he argues, know what policies are needed to "reverse the updraft of wealth", including substantial modifications to the tax system, increasing the minimum wage and supporting labor organizations.
"It was so, so close, and the legislation really did reflect the will of the most of people who really want lawmakers to address some of these pressing issues," Collins said. "Elite control is not about building so much as blocking. It's easier to block than it is to make something significant occur, but the muscle memory is there. We know what that looks like."
Collins is optimistic that there can be change, but said it would require ongoing legislative effort.
"It may be sooner than expected that the pendulum swings back, and then it really is about sustaining a ongoing grassroots effort to make progress on this profound imbalance we're living in," he said. "We can solve this. It is solvable."